Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Arithmetic\s+Check\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Arithmetic\s+Check\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Arithmetic Check (score: 1): Author: w4wbt@fmci.net (Bill Taylor(W4WBT)); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:22:18 -0400; The "s" meter in the 340 is very accurate, reading actual signal level at the antenna. It is what should have been put into the new transceiver . Not only would it make signal readings accurate but g; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00000.html (8,211 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Arithmetic Check (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:59:08 -0500; Bill, it is past history, but the Kachina 505 DSP has can display the received signal in S units, dBm or uVolts. The S-meter is linearized by table lookup with the table being developed for each tran; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00002.html (8,197 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Arithmetic Check (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:47:24 -1000; Hi, I am learning to use a new propagation predicting program, called ACE-HF (see, http://home.att.net/~acehf/da1.htm ). Program uses the VOACAP prediction "engine". One of the predicted parameters i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00491.html (7,744 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Arithmetic Check (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:38:53 -0400; Looks to me like you got it OK Jim. I have always used the relationships you derived there for voltage to db conversion, Namely, 0.5/2 X voltage = 6db power change. 0.1/10 X voltage = 20db power chan; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00492.html (8,947 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Arithmetic Check (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:51:09 -1000; Thanks to the several of you who have replied to my query. I was pretty accurate. Made one really big goof: reported that the S meter of the RX-340 went up to +80 dBm! Cerrtainly not; it goes to +10d; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00502.html (7,170 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]