Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+B\&W\s+low\s+pass\s+filter\s+rating\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "tuscola" <tuscola@tds.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:05:50 -0500
Hi, since Scott brought up his request for a low pass filter and different models are being brought up, I thought that someone might be able to help me with the rating on a B&W low pass filter with a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00030.html (7,346 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:44:33 -0600
If this is the one with UHF connectors on it, (or type N) it is rated for 1 KW. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00031.html (7,247 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: HBW0MXY@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:16:54 EST
Jim: I have a Barker & Williamson model # 425 low pass filter. The instruction sheet for it shows the following: Frequency range : 1.5 to 30 MHz Power rating : 1 KW of RF power There is no informatio
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00032.html (7,092 bytes)

4. RE: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "K. Indart" <kitdart@ntelos.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:24:56 -0500
Jim, Check the Barker & Williamson webpage for that info. 73,Ken WA4RPH Hi, since Scott brought up his request for a low pass filter and different models are being brought up, I thought that someone
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00037.html (8,462 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:35:44 -0500
Jim... Cutoff freq 34 mhz Max atten freq 52 Mhz Min atten (dB) 70 Impedance 50 ohms Power rating 1500 watts 73 Phil Chambley (friend of Ed MacKenzie) K4DPK -- Original Message -- From: "tuscola" <tus
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00038.html (8,443 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:50:58 -0800 (PST)
For what it's worth (OT), I expect the power ratings (and frequency response, too) are based on 1:1 VSWR / 50 ohms. It would be useful to know what they can do with say 2:1 VSWR. I.e., you want some
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00039.html (7,644 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:24:19 -0500
Phil, Not nit-picking here, but why would the specs leave out insertion loss ? One of the most important specs for anything after your final RF output device. Also interesting that very few manufactu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00040.html (9,912 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:31:32 -0500
Dunno Tom... Got that info from a B&W Catalog I found in a drawer. Remember too, those power ratings are for AM. I guess with 80% efficient Class C, you can afford a little insertion loss. __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00041.html (10,863 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <m.ewing@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:46:40 -0800 (PST)
For what it's worth (OT), I expect the power ratings (and frequency response, too) are based on 1:1 VSWR / 50 ohms. It would be useful to know what they can do with say 2:1 VSWR. I.e., you want some
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00058.html (8,353 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] B&W low pass filter rating (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:47:55 -0500
Well, if they aren't terminated in the design impedance, they aren't going to be much of a low pass filter anyway. 73 K4DPK -- Original Message -- From: "Martin Ewing" <m.ewing@snet.net> To: <tentec@
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00060.html (8,877 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu