Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+COMMUNICATIONS\s+SPEAKERS\s+Article\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: ARDUJENSKI@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:35:26 -0500 (EST)
I stumbled across this article addressing COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS. I plan to try to locate one to try later this week. Thought I might share the article with you folk also _http://www.k3dav.com/commu
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00379.html (6,850 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:29:30 -0500
YES - the author makes a good case for using something tailored to the task. Thinking along the same lines, I recently purchased a B*I*C center channel speaker for my rig. The article is correct, tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00380.html (9,274 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:19:33 -0800
Bullsh&t. What is needed for good speech quality is nothing more or less than a loudspeaker with flat response AND uniform coverage in the speech range. And, because many (most?) ham rigs don't have
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00383.html (9,615 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:56:36 +0000
I couldn't agree more with Jim's comments. If you want to tailor the sound, do it in the electronics, not in the speaker. The speaker should be an accurate transducer. And I love my little RCA/Radio
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00384.html (10,192 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:34:19 +0100
Barry, Jim, I have a pair of Rat Shack Minimus-7 (label says Realistic). I don't know if it is from the same company you guys are referring to or not. The audio quality not bad. Do you guys know it?
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00385.html (11,392 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:24:03 +0000
Rick, I believe the Minimus 7 may be the same speaker as long as the enclosure is ported with a 4 inch woofer and 1 inch dome tweeter. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00387.html (12,797 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Don Allen <w9cw@w9cw.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:06:08 -0600
FWIW... I find this speaker excellent for use with my Ten-Tec transceivers: http://www.avantonepro.com/Avantone-Passive-MixCube-Monitors-In-Black.html They are available either in Active or Passive m
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00390.html (11,172 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:02:19 -0600 (CST)
One of the better choices I've found can be typically had for $5 or so at most hamfests. Look for the Motorola mobile communications speakers used in the earlier products such as MICOR. GE Mastr Pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00393.html (11,025 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:09:15 -0600
This is a decades-long ongoing debate which began with radios that had no ability to shape the speaker/headphone audio. Using "hi-fi" headphones/speakers, indeed, provide accurate reproduction of eve
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00394.html (12,498 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:20:37 -0600
Few subjects will probably illicit more passionate response than the one of what speaker should I use. Simple answer. The one that sounds best to you. Recent tinkering with my OMNI VI to make it soun
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00396.html (15,561 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:25:05 -0800
That's the model we used for measurement work. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00397.html (9,827 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:36:35 -0600
Well you certainly seem to have a handle on things related to sh&t.....doesn't really add any value to the discussion though.... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00399.html (11,242 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:41:51 -0800 (PST)
I'll second that... the Motorola speakers sound great!  I just let my fleshly side of things take over and struggle to put one next to my Eagle and say it looks good... not!   Sent from Yahoo! Mail o
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00401.html (9,194 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:10:30 -0500
On 2/27/2013 3:19 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 2/26/2013 10:29 PM, Richards wrote: YES - the author makes a good case for using something tailored to the task. Bullsh&t. There is no need to get crude or a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00404.html (18,920 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:42:30 -0500
___________________________________________ No... not the prettiest one for sure. ;-) ____________________ JHR __________________ . _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00405.html (9,087 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:04:29 -0600
De ja vu; "You want one that looks nice or one that works?" 73 ES DX, Gary -- AB9M ___________________________________________ No... not the prettiest one for sure. ;-) ____________________ JHR _____
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00406.html (10,505 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:12:37 -0600 (CST)
A bit of paint and a clean-up job and they do look good. Folks, it's not TV......it's radio. If one can't hear and understand the station, what good is the rest of the crap on the desk? 73 Bob, K4TAX
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00407.html (10,080 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:14:06 -0500
Exactly... I would hate to have a serious wood-worker critique my homemade speaker boxes !! ;-) What a great group. We have wrestled over microphones, headphones, and now speakers... and remain frien
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00408.html (10,170 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:48:54 -0600
Hi Folks, I have about 6-8 of the Motorola speakers. These have a diecast front panel painted a cream color with the Motorola name in red. The back cover is gray in color. I discovered these speakers
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00410.html (11,385 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:55:27 -0500
CODE KEY???? What, I have to know code to be a "real ham"???? (Hows that one??) ...Dave What a great group. We have wrestled over microphones, headphones, and now speakers... and remain friends. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00411.html (10,219 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu