Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+Calling\s+Freq\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+Calling\s+Freq\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CW Calling Freq (score: 1): Author: hglent@ix.netcom.com (hglent); Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:25:30 -0700; I think a CW calling freq is a great idea. However, if this is going to be used to help stimulate more CW activity and perhaps draw more of the newcomers into the art, we should all be very careful t; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00316.html (7,444 bytes)
2. [TenTec] CW Calling Freq (score: 1): Author: mauro@idt.net (Bob Mauro - PeopleNet); Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:20:06 -0500 (EST); This is such a great idea. Im thinking it's gotta be on 20 meters and on a novice band too. An over 20 wpm freq and an under 20 wpm freq. Bob Mauro, Mauro@Idt.Net Amateur Radio Station KZ2G -- Vistit; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00317.html (7,763 bytes)
3. [TenTec] CW Calling Freq (score: 1): Author: EAvila@caiso.com (Avila, Edward); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:02:17 -0800; Paul, very good point!!! I think a CW calling freq is a great idea. However, if this is going to be used to help stimulate more CW activity and perhaps draw more of the newcomers into the art, we sho; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00336.html (8,019 bytes)
4. [TenTec] CW Calling Freq (score: 1): Author: w7kxb@cableaz.com (Bill Harris); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:10:06 -0700; I agree. A calling freq. should be used for that only. Qsy up/down a few kc's for the qso. A calling Fq. in the novice portion of 80/40/15 and 10 would be great. Establishing one for the remaining ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00345.html (9,370 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]