Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s+inactivity\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CW inactivity (score: 1)
Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:57:46 -0500
Over the last 18 years I have spent a lot of time ragchewing on 40 meter CW in the 7.030 range where many of the QRQ CW gang are lurking. Back even about 10 years ago, I could get on 7.030 +/- 5 kHz
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00230.html (9,604 bytes)

2. [TenTec] CW inactivity (score: 1)
Author: Frank Krozel" <frank@electronicinstrument.com (Frank Krozel)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:45:02 -0600
Hey Scott! Try about 5 or so watts, and get on 7.040. There are lots of us there, but (sigh) I think we believe we are back using crystals because we don't move around much. Frank KG9H Triton II, S/N
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00231.html (11,053 bytes)

3. [TenTec] CW inactivity (score: 1)
Author: rbdrake@erols.com (Richard B Drake)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:50:16 -0500
Scott, Burn the midnight oil a little more and move a little lower in frequency, 7.000 - 7.025. Pop out a CQ around midnight (EST) when the Europeans are having their first cup of coffee and if you d
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00232.html (11,669 bytes)

4. [TenTec] CW inactivity (score: 1)
Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:54:41 -0600
Times have changed but we don't have to go quietly or soon. Why don't we pick a freq. to monitor when we are in the shack doing something else. It could be an informal cw meeting place one band for d
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00279.html (11,547 bytes)

5. [TenTec] CW inactivity (score: 1)
Author: w4foa@voy.net (B. J. "Tony" Martin)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:33:51 -0500
Great idea David. Maybe somewhere up the band on 30 meters might be a good place to start? Just an idea. Tony, W4FOA To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- Watch your thoughts; they become words. Watch your
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00283.html (12,845 bytes)

6. [TenTec] CW Inactivity (score: 1)
Author: kb2tvi@qsl.net (steve roberts)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:21:14 -0000
The idea set forth is a good one. Unfortunately, there are Novices and Tech Plus', like myself, who cannot access the bands and frequencies that are suggested. Therefore, we would have to be excluded
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00285.html (7,708 bytes)

7. [TenTec] CW Inactivity (score: 1)
Author: cooperj@jobe.net (John Cooper)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:41:30 -0600
This a great idea! Count me in too. Best regards, John K0OI -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00287.html (7,249 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu