- 1. [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:44:26 -1000
- Is there any validity to the notion that deleting CW functionality from a rig could make it cheaper? Let's see, what additional parts are needed to make a SSB capable rig operate in CW mode? For rece
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00378.html (10,771 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:17:45 +0300
- Yes, IMHO there is. Wrong. You are assuming that a narrow SSB filter, which COULD be, WOULD be. Quite simply it would not. So a user would be able to recieve CW in USB mode with a 2.4 kHz bandwidth.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00379.html (14,552 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:36:12 -0500
- For many years I operated both CW and SSB with an ancient National NCX-5 transceiver. That relic has an excellent 2.4 KHz filter, and was quite usable on CW. I eventually added an Autek audio filter
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00380.html (17,491 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:46:13 -1000
- Hi Geoffrey, I have never had any trouble receiving CW with a 2.4 kHz wide, or wider IF bandwidth. And were talking about the additional cost of making the rig CW capable, versus SSB only. We're not
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00381.html (15,415 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:57:02 -0500
- See the latest QST! CW and SSB 5 watt rig for $50! 73, Gary - AB9M _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00387.html (12,586 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: "JAMES HANLON" <knjhanlon@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:13:57 -0600
- Guys, You should have a look at the May 2008 QST, page 33. The winner of the ARRL Homebrew Challenge competition is featured, the TAK-40 SSB and CW transceiver. It has the following features. It cove
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00388.html (7,840 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Ralph Covington <ralph.covington@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:03:37 +0000
- Wouldn't this be a great project for a club?> From: knjhanlon@msn.com> To: tentec@contesting.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:13:57 -0600> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig> > Guys,> > You
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00389.html (8,841 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:19:12 -0400
- Based on what I've read here lately, if CW were eliminated from that rig, they'd have to pay you to take one. Mike N4NT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00390.html (9,308 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:05:01 -0400
- How long do you think it will be before someone offers the project as an "all parts included" kit for around $75 - $100? Bet they would sell a bunch at that price, too. 73 Guys, You should have a loo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00397.html (9,196 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Cheap SSB and not CW rig (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Prather <rprather@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:25:07 -0700
- Probably would but, unfortunately, to existing hams... Now if a club used the kit to get new hams involved we might be on to something. Rick K6LE _______________________________________________ TenTe
- /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00399.html (7,689 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu