Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Comments\s+from\s+an\s+ORION\s+user\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Comments\s+from\s+an\s+ORION\s+user\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Comments from an ORION user (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:27:34 -0500; Beppe, I agree with your comments. The Orion is a great performing rig, but the user interface presentation on the screen is not up to the same standard and degrades the perceived quality of the radi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00180.html (11,285 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Comments from an ORION user (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:01:26 EST; Since everyone has their gripes and answers, I thought the following summary of airline repair posts and responses might be of interest to the list. Supposedly they are actual repair requests from pi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00183.html (7,850 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Comments from an ORION user (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:07:11 +0000; For the most part, these Orion issues are not very important to me. However, I do agree that we could lose the PBT/BW graphic and improve (not lose) the subrx s-meter . 73, Barry N1EU _______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00187.html (7,471 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Comments from an ORION user (score: 1): Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:09:43 -0800 (PST); Buck, I'm proud of you as it just goes to show HUMOR, even out here, is NOT DEAD!!! Fortunately the ORION nit-picking is rather sparse!!! Just goes to prove overall it's a damn great rig!!! _________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00198.html (10,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]