Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Contest\s+Data\s+and\s+Conclusions\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:37:56 -0500
In both 2004 CQ WW SSB & CW Contests, I had the highest number of 10m QSO's of any USA station, including all the major multiops. Top tier M/M's have much larger antenna systems, multiple operators,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00887.html (7,754 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:22:18 -0600
My conclusions? I love my Orion, it really doesn't bother me that some don't like it, and I only hope my competition doesn't discover it. And as an accurate, but subjective statement ... I'd agree wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00891.html (8,916 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:44:22 -0500
due to not enough ops ... some bands don't get as much time as a single op might be able to ... or new/growing ops ... or prop. No, for a single band operator, they are the best comparison. The top t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00900.html (10,002 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:04:01 -0500
And while your doing what Bill suggest with Yaesu, also pick up the phone and call Ten Tec and ask them about fixing the Orion firmware so their Titan 3 will work on the Orion's keying loop. The stan
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00901.html (8,742 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:33:54 -0500
W4BQF: phone and call Ten Tec and ask them about fixing the Orion firmware so their Titan 3 will work on the Orion's keying loop. The standard answer you get is "Gosh, we have never heard of that pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00902.html (8,293 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:02:55 -0500
Of course I don't know about 'all' Orion's, but I was sent a spare unit to evaluate and it performed the same way. My Orion's didn't suffer 'nosebleed' due to any way I operate it. High speed QSK was
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00903.html (10,479 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:28:46 -0500
W4BQF: unit to evaluate and it performed the same way. My Orion's didn't suffer 'nosebleed' due to any way I operate it. High speed QSK was not an option because as you know, until a firmware update,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00905.html (9,196 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Tommy Very Strange MY Titan III works works fine with my Orion's keying loop for SSB. Does it just happen with CW ?? WB4QDA John __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00908.html (10,015 bytes)

9. RE: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Michel" <w9op@athenet.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:02:27 -0000
My Orion and Titan III are working quite well together. Mark, W9OP Tommy Very Strange MY Titan III works works fine with my Orion's keying loop for SSB. Does it just happen with CW ?? WB4QDA John ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00915.html (11,191 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:14:23 -0500
I don't know if the problem is just with CW, but since you have no problems with the keying loop, it certainly would seem like a CW only problem. I have only tried SSB with the Orion and Titan one ti
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00918.html (11,983 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:32:23 -0500
I really would like to respond to this, however, in the spirit of this Christmas time, I have no wish to further embarass anyone at Ten Tec. I will just tell you Bill, if my problem were unique, you
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00925.html (11,074 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:33:53 -0500
Under what conditions? Do you used Keying Loop #1 or #1? Do you run full QSK CW at 30 wpm? Have you ever had your Orion to just stop outputting RF while your in a QSO with anyone? Tom - W4BQF "So you
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00929.html (12,081 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:34:40 -0600
Bill, Again, congrats on your contesting scores/effort. You continue to create straw men ... with lots of what-if's such as the time the M/x staffed the bands/etc. Ditto as to the prop/etc. As my pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00931.html (10,289 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:45:43 -0800 (PST)
I have Loop one and loop 2 turned on and the Titan 3 has worked for a year .I don't remember which Orion Ruf I was using when I first got my Titan3 but the Amp has worked with with all the Orion upda
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00940.html (14,229 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 14:08:17 -0500
Thanks for the info John. I appreciate it. I'm certainly not questioning what your doing John, I just don't fully understand it. Can you please tell me why you have BOTH loop 1 and loop 2 turned on?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00944.html (15,186 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 14:13:38 -0500
such as the time the M/x staffed the bands/etc. Ditto as to the prop/etc. As my prof used to say, beware the sample size of one ... stats can be used to "justify" about anything. Sample size of 1???
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00946.html (11,251 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Tom I don't remember why . I just turn both keying loops on after a master reset just out of habbit. no other reason and the Amp and Orion have worked from day one with the amp in the qsk position. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00949.html (18,307 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:51:19 -0800 (PST)
Tom I don't remember why . I just turn both keying loops on after a master reset just out of habbit. no other reason and the Amp and Orion have worked from day one with the amp in the qsk position. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00950.html (18,259 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 22:02:23 -0600
Hello Billy, Saw ur thread and just wanted to wish u and urs a Merry almost over xmas and Happy New Year. I don't hear you on 2m any more. Chuck and Don Moore on daily. Chuck is completly rebuilding
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00982.html (10,925 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu