- 1. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: "Donald Kemp" <nn8b.oh@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:26:26 -0400
- I have the original sales brochures for the Corsair and Corsair II. I could scan them for anyone who wants copies of them. You can get a pretty good idea of the differences from the specs. -- 73, Don
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00069.html (6,814 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:13:11 -0400
- Gary AB9M posted: The CORSAIR-II, with its PTO and AZNAC type receiver design, may be one of the finest, quietest analog receivers ever built, at least by Ten-Tec... Did the original Corsair employ t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00122.html (9,930 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:00:43 -0400
- There have been several references recently to "AZNAC" (or is it "ANZAC"?) receiver design. Can someone please give a short review? I tried google but got no useful results. Thanks and 73 Mike W2IY G
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00124.html (10,414 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:05:35 -0500
- The ANZAC mixer is a commonly used where a double balanced mixer is required. The Corsair / Corsair-II receiver MAY have used a mixer similar in design to one of ANZAC's.... Google (ANZAC mixer)... 7
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00126.html (11,534 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:18:05 -0400
- Gary, Thanks! My mistake was googling "anzac receiver design" and of course got nothing useful. 73 Mike The ANZAC mixer is a commonly used where a double balanced mixer is required. The Corsair / Cor
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00127.html (11,814 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:32:06 -0500
- Mike, You are welcome. I regret that I cannot locate the document where I originally saw the reference to Corsair / Corsair-II having ANZAC receiver design and later commentary on later TEN-TEC recei
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00129.html (13,532 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:53:56 +0000
- Here you go, posted 2007 to this list by Jerry K0CQ. 73, Barry N1EU The bipolar RF (and first IF) stage uses transformer feedback with a three winding transformer. Its a circuit developed for the out
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00130.html (11,486 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:14:07 +0000
- The amplifier in question is probably better known as the "Norton Amplifier" after its inventor Dr David Norton. Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00131.html (9,778 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:14:06 -0500
- The amplifier described below is also sometimes known as a "Norton Amp" since Dr. David Norton patented it in 1975. Because of the patents, it has not been used all that much. The amplifier is also k
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00132.html (12,497 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 02:10:46 +0100
- The biggest problem with mixers feeding directly into a crystal filter is, the mixer always has TWO outputs (the sum and the difference frequencies). One of them is the desired frequency (i.e. 9 MHz)
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00133.html (14,379 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu