Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FS\:\s+One\s+Ten\-Tec\s+filter\s+left\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FS\:\s+One\s+Ten\-Tec\s+filter\s+left\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] FS: One Ten-Tec filter left. (score: 1): Author: Augie Hansen <augie.hansen@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:09:22 -0600; 9 MHz filter (for NAR position in Omni V, VI, and VI Plus -- Model 218 1.8 KHz, 8-pole All of the other filters that I had previously offered have been claimed. The current list price for the filter; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01239.html (8,047 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] FS: One Ten-Tec filter left. (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:43 -0000; How did the V test ? -- Original Message -- From: "Augie Hansen" <augie.hansen@comcast.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>; "For Sale-Swap Reflector" <forsale-swap@mail; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01240.html (8,506 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] FS: One Ten-Tec filter left. (score: 1): Author: Augie Hansen <augie.hansen@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:36:22 -0600; Hi Steve, It did quite well compared to the other rigs that were available at the time it was introduced around 1990. The summary of receiver performance, which is what Rob and I were testing the Omn; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01244.html (8,575 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] FS: One Ten-Tec filter left. (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:46:50 -0000; Thanks. Familiar with that stuff. Ddidn't realize who Rob was. time is the number _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01253.html (9,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]