Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Filters\s*$/: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: <k8vf_mark@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:59:22 -0400; The 750, 759, and roofing filter have been spoken for.(pending funds) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00484.html (6,619 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: AG2A <ag2a@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:51:39 -0500; I have three (3) Ten Tec filters for the Omni +. Models 288 and 285 (1.8 & .5 Khz) for the 6.3 I.F. and a model 217 (.5 Khz) for the 9 Mhz I.F. at $ 65 each shipped. Tom - AG2A ______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00728.html (6,408 bytes)
43. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: AE4BC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:38:59 EST; Just purchased OmniVI OPT.3 I have heard that the Inrad filters really make a difference with this rig. Which filters would some of you guys prefer for SSB,CW operation. Thanks Bill **Start the year; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00349.html (6,480 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:49:54 -0600; I don't know, my Omni VI+ worked great with the Ten-Tec (Network Science) crystal ladder filters. Especially the 250Hz 2nd IF (6.3 Mhz) filter - it's amazing in removing noise. 73, Duane Duane Calvin; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00354.html (7,552 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: Steve Miller <hsmiller@awsllc.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:56:18 -0600; At the risk of exposing my ignorance (of which there is way too much), which are the recommended filters....the ones from TT or Inrad? Thanks, Steve N0SM _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00189.html (6,459 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:02:27 +0000; For which radio? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00190.html (7,448 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: Steve Miller <hsmiller@awsllc.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:33:52 -0600; At the risk of exposing my ignorance (of which there is way too much), which are the recommended filters for the Orion II....the ones from TT or Inrad? Thanks, Steve N0SM ____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00191.html (7,017 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: "David & Chris Drake" <drakes@psci.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:47:47 -0500; Steve, If buying from scratch, which you are doing, Inrad is the way to go. 500hz. Good luck, David Wd9cmd _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00197.html (8,158 bytes)
49. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: John Peters <k2lot@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:20:45 -0500; I have a omni VI+ coming and it is hard to wait for the delivery.... I would like to know where I may get the 2.8 kc filters. I have heard that the SSB is a little narrow and I would like it a little; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00195.html (6,694 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:32:47 -0600; After using a Collins S-line on SSB, I think 2.4 is a bit wide. Collins used a 2.1 standard. Don't forget that you have to realign the BFO and its warps to use the wider filter. More filters are avai; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00196.html (7,884 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:45:00 +0000; ARRL measured rx audio passband of 1630hz on the 6+ due to af circuitry so a wider i.f. filter isn't going to buy you THAT much on receive. If you want more fidelity, the 6+ isn't a great choice with; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00197.html (8,647 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Ed Malmgren" <janed@burgoyne.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:27:21 -0600; Inrad Filters Would like to sell all together $300.00 plus shipping. Money Order preferred. Contact Ed K7UC janed@burgoyne.com Telephone 801-731-9667 Ed K7UC _________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00141.html (6,665 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 22:57:49 -0500; Yah we know, but the set doesn't seem to tickle our ears. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00142.html (7,466 bytes)
54. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:12:42 -0800 (PST); I have an omni 6 ,, is there any way to tell what the filter is in 9mhz IF, i guess what i'm asking is it marked or stamped etc. Thanks and 73 John Ku3G ______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00037.html (6,986 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:42:35 -0600; There should be a 5 digit number on the filter and there has been a list posted to this forum. But there is a list with part numbers and model numbers at: http://www.tentecwiki.org/doku.php?id=filter; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00039.html (7,582 bytes)
56. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: Ralph Arnold <rea.papaof10@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:05:33 -0100; i'll take the 288 1800 hz where do i send payment--KD8BTQ--Ralph _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-07/msg00018.html (6,881 bytes)
57. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:56:05 -0500; I finally got around to doing a sweep of the filters on the PBT board in my Omni VI using the Midnight SNA. I think I see why the signal level shown on the S-meter increases when I switch from 2.4 Kh; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-09/msg00075.html (6,878 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:21:45 +0200; No you don't, it's broken. 73 Rick, DJ0IP I finally got around to doing a sweep of the filters on the PBT board in my Omni VI using the Midnight SNA. I think I see why the signal level shown on the S; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-09/msg00076.html (8,232 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 23:32:14 -0500; ??? The 2.4 Khz filter I have is broken? That's what I think. I wouldn't think -24 db for the peaks in the passband of the filter would be "normal" The other filters were all around -15 db peaks in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-09/msg00077.html (9,116 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] Filters (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:43:34 +0200; You're wasting your time. You already found the forest. If you ignore the trees, you'll see it! (hi) That filter probably has a bad crystal. Just get a new filter Stan. 73 Rick, DJ0IP ??? The 2.4 Khz; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-09/msg00078.html (10,066 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]