Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+HAM\s+RADIO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+HAM\s+RADIO\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:53:54 -0400; N4PY: II shows a consistent 6 hertz difference between the 2 receivers. My software now perfectly corrects this when in diversity mode. The offset is ~2.33 Hz in my Orion. How do you correct for frac; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00142.html (6,677 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:04:25 -0700; For those in need of 2 super receivers I believe Carl's software also allows the Orion to use a Ten-Tec RX-331 or RX-340 as a sub receiver. That's not in my budget -- yet -- but I can dream. 73, Rick; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00143.html (8,266 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Michael W Elliott <kq0b@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:39:40 -0700 (PDT); Thanks Carl I've enjoyed your software Carl Moreschi <n4py@arrl.net> wrote: My software also now offers a main/sub calibration. I am finding my Orion II shows a consistent 6 hertz difference between; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00146.html (10,790 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Shawn Upton <kb1ckt@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:20:01 -0700 (PDT); That would be cool. Simple setup, PTO, quiet frequency readout (or at least an output jack for external freq meter), QSK, a "real" CW transciever for the CW person with maybe 50W or so. The C21 setup; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00149.html (10,212 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "William Lee" <n5wrx@stx.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:39:27 -0500; I think the death of the novice class sounded the end of CW only rigs. With CW requirements going the same way a CW only rig would not seem to be profitable to manufacture. The only group keeping CW; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00151.html (10,034 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:29:59 EDT; My biggest problem is that on ver 2.XX I have a real problem with the audio on the monitor, it is real scratchy and staticey on the orion (origonal ver) and both of 2.xx versions, I have had problems; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00152.html (9,145 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:35:05 EDT; My software also now offers a main/sub calibration. I am finding my Orion II shows a consistent 6 hertz difference between the 2 receivers. My software now perfectly corrects this when in diversity m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00154.html (8,310 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: K7wpz@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:44:14 EDT; Hi, Scott. I have been licensed since 1949 and over the years I have had occasion to call a manufacturer help desk. Until TT, the last satisfactory exchange was with Heathkit; they left out a .01 Ufd; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00155.html (8,599 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:45:17 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00157.html (8,518 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Don Prater" <w4to@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:39:40 -0400; Barry, I agree but don't trash the display. Do it right. Fix the sweep. Don W4TO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00158.html (9,209 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Rick and Karen Bunn" <RRBunn@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:02:49 -0400; Just an OMNI 7 would be nice. 73 Rick N4ASX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00189.html (9,105 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Brad Bradford" <y2kbrad@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:42:48 -0500; How bout an ORION IIX (The two "X") that will allow multiple selection of Version Releases on "Boot-Up" like our PC's. i.e. OS/2, Linx, Koppix as a PC example. The ORION two "X" when power is being t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00203.html (10,782 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:45:08 -0700 (PDT); Well said David 73 John WB4QDA Hi, Scott. I have been licensed since 1949 and over the years I have had occasion to call a manufacturer help desk. Until TT, the last satisfactory exchange was with He; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00204.html (9,808 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:06:58 EDT; as long as we are wishing I would like to see a single BIG box with an orion equivalent in it along with a 6N2 and a 220 and 440 all mode. the perfect radio 160 to 440 all band all mode all in one bo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00205.html (8,862 bytes)
35. [TenTec] HAM RADIO (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 16:05:31 -0400; Ham equipment economics , Japanese companies gradually began to offer Ham equipment that cheaper so AMERICA companies left the market . This came to me in a Ham news letter. _________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00107.html (6,688 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]