Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ICOM\s+7300\s+Sherwood\s+Report\s+vs\.\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Radios\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ICOM\s+7300\s+Sherwood\s+Report\s+vs\.\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Radios\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] ICOM 7300 Sherwood Report vs. Ten-Tec Radios (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:00:14 +0200; Hi Terry, Unfortunately the list is no longer fool-proof. In fact it is deceiving. If you notice, the IC-7300 is above the Orion and just under the Orion II. Yet the Orion will out-perform the 7300 q; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00223.html (9,479 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ICOM 7300 Sherwood Report vs. Ten-Tec Radios (score: 1): Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:47:58 +0200; Rob Sherwood has chosen the DR3 @2Khz as ranking. Sure one could prioritize for any other here, or make a equasion out of several But there is much more to it about deciding what is a better receiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00226.html (12,341 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]