Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+IP3\s+vs\.\s+DR3\s+$IMD$\s+confusion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+IP3\s+vs\.\s+DR3\s+$IMD$\s+confusion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 15:36:35 +0000 (UTC); There seems to be some confusion and conflation of these two RX performance measurement parameters in recent threads. They are NOT the same thing at all. I'm seeing people write "IP3" (Third Order In; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00157.html (8,677 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:56:28 +0200; Hi Duane, 40 years ago when all of this begin, we did focus on IP3. We didn't know better. Some time in the 90s the focus switched to DR3 which, as you say, is far more meaningful because we can shov; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00160.html (9,446 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion (score: 1): Author: Chris Howard w0ep <w0ep@w0ep.us>; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 13:18:22 -0500; I seem to remember a series of letters or articles in QEX about the difficulties of characterizing SDR radios and how IP3 was no longer the thing. I'll see if I can find it. _________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00162.html (7,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]