Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\s+roofing\s+filter\s+mod\s+for\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\s+roofing\s+filter\s+mod\s+for\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Inrad roofing filter mod for Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Thomas <ac7a@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:12:41 -0800; Hi, First off, my Omni VI+ is a terrific radio. Recently, I had an opportunity to get a newer radio, maybe fancier radio, if I were willing to sell my Omni. It was an exciting prospect at first, but; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00200.html (8,308 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Inrad roofing filter mod for Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Moore" <andrew.nv1b@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:48:48 -0500; I recently acquired a VI+ with InRad 765, along with 500 and 250 Hz filters in both IF's. I have to admit I haven't figured out how to use the setup well enough to see the big advantage with the InR; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00201.html (8,440 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Inrad roofing filter mod for Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:11:14 -0600; Thomas - I have an Omni VI+ that I purchased used and then installed the Inrad cw filter in. My Omni has all of the cw filters. I went with the low pitch filter and I would recommend it highly. It re; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00202.html (9,840 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Inrad roofing filter mod for Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:01:36 -1000; Hi Thomas, The Inrad filter may make a substantial improvement. To say that it increases dynamic range may not be exactly correct. I would say that, given the dynamic range the Omni VI IF circuitry h; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00203.html (10,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]