Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+and\s+33\s+foot\s+vertical\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+and\s+33\s+foot\s+vertical\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: "David Humelsine" <n5wmqmail@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:29:50 -0600; I have decided to up grade my ham shack with a Jupiter. My present set up is an Argonaut V with a 33 foot vertical and 36 radials. I have a SGC 237 tuner at the base of the vertical for multi band us; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00046.html (7,734 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 11:49:41 -0400; Oh, this should be so ONLINE ............... Very INTERESTING ................. but ! Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00047.html (8,424 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Lamb" <wm.aaron.lamb@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:05:25 -0400; Well I don't have a Jupiter with the internal ATU but I will share this tidbit. Having the tuner at (or really close to) the feed point of the antenna is going to give you the most efficiency regardl; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00048.html (9,116 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: Fernando Quinones <n2fq@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:19:33 -0700; Hello. I'm running a Jupiter and 48ft Vertical. Your SGC and Vertical should work with any rig since the tuner is activated by RF. Why change the system that's working for you. You have a plug n play; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00049.html (8,645 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 09:11:04 -1000; A 33 foot vertical is not a particularly good choice of length for use on multiple bands. End fed it will have a very high impedance on 20 meters.If you can make it longer it will be an easier match; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00050.html (10,223 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: Henry Mackey <kb9cqo@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 15:14:08 -0400 (EDT); David/N5WMQ I agree with the ham that suggest you replace your Argonaut V with the Jupiter leaving the rest of your setup as is. Unless there are other reasons for changing something else in your set; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00051.html (7,975 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and 33 foot vertical. (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:36:28 -0500; Why not keept the present tuner at the base of the 33 foot vertical, and use the inbuilt Jupiter tuner to fine tune any residual SWR? Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00056.html (7,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]