Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+LOTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+LOTW\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:01:39 -0400; Hello Again, N4PY mentioned that his response rate might be fairly low because he has a lot of older QSOs posted. In my personal experience, I like E-QSL because I'm constantly amazed how I get a QSL; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00349.html (6,966 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:26:31 +0000; If you remember, E-QSL at one time had an electronic signature requirment. This was to make the security such that the ARRL would accept their product. The ARRL rejected it because they wanted their; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00355.html (9,013 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:46:34 -0400; My return rate for W3WN has been about 25%. My return rate under WN3VAW was under 10%, but if you discount my logs prior to about 1995, it also approaches 25%. Considering that most older logs exist; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00357.html (9,295 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:50:02 -0400; "at one time" I don't think that even lasted a week. And the ARRL didn't reject it. As I remember from the QSL reflector at the time, the user base was up in arms about it suddenly being implemented; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00358.html (9,824 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: stoskopf@tri.net; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:08:58 -0500 (CDT); A great addition would be for the major contests to submit their logs to LOTW. The checkers could eliminate any 'uniques'. Most of us work DXCC in some category each contest and never get nearly that; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00391.html (7,383 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: KC1DI <davekc1di@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:20:57 -0400; Many more would up load to L.O.T.W. if were much less cumbersome a process. They should have taken Eqsl up on their offer years ago.. E-qsl has a fine system and it works very well. There are more aw; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00403.html (8,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]