Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Local\s+vs\s+UTC\s+for\s+Nets\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Local\s+vs\s+UTC\s+for\s+Nets\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: W1GOR@Maine.RR.Com (W1GOR); Date: Sat May 3 08:53:36 2003; If this were a LOCAL net, on VHF or UHF, LOCAL time would be appropriate, but, since this is a world-wide net on 20 meters, UTC would be the best and possible the ONLY choice, placing EVERYONE on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00040.html (9,414 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: mnewell1@austin.rr.com (Michael A. Newell, WB4HUC); Date: Sat May 3 09:12:36 2003; Ok, folks, don't get carried away. To Steve, KB9GP: Use your imagination. If you're on daylight savings time, then it's EDST, if you're on standard time, tnen it's EST. To Bill, KC4ATU who says the p; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00041.html (11,317 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Sat May 3 09:24:15 2003; Mike: Keep up the good work. The whiners are in the minority. We can be thankful that most of us don't live in Indiana where they never know what time it is 73, John N1JM near Buffalo, NY --Original; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00042.html (12,151 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: W3GQJ@attbi.com (John T. Fleming); Date: Sat May 3 10:26:53 2003; To add fuel to the fire, Steve is just trying to emphasize that Indianans and Arizonans don't change their clocks. Hawaii is the same way. Steve must have grandfather clocks! But when is the 40 meter; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00043.html (11,943 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: kd9bo@mac.com (Steve Weber); Date: Sat May 3 12:06:10 2003; Maybe, Maybe not. Those of us in Northwest Indiana change time zones along with Chicago, which makes it even more confusing. But then I'm already confused enough as it is. -- 73 de Steve Weber, KD9BO; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00045.html (8,399 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat May 3 13:55:48 2003; Yes, living out here, the time I save is NOT having to go about the entire house changing all the clocks/watches twice a year! Another blessing of living in Paradise. At our latitude, there really i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00047.html (8,361 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Local vs UTC for Nets... (score: 1): Author: selekjr2@attbi.com (Stephen Elek, Jr. ); Date: Sat May 3 20:39:54 2003; John, Ken Hopper's website at www.N9VV.com has the latest TenTec net frequencies and times. ...Steve B:) --Original Message-- From: tentec@contesting.com To: <tentec@contesting.com> Date: Saturday, M; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00059.html (12,451 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]