Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Mic\s+for\s+Jupiter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Mic\s+for\s+Jupiter\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Mic for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Bill Nicolson <k2rig@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:57:30 -0400; I'm trying to decide on whether to buy a Ten Tec 705 or the new 708 Mic for my Jupiter. What's your opinion? Thanks, Bill K2rig Fists #2016 NJQRP #068 NAQCC #3729 SKCC #5469 http://mysite.verizon.net; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-07/msg00048.html (7,739 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Mic for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: NC2F <nc2f@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:34:32 -0400; Bill, Having used both over the years with good audio reports for each, I would say you can't really go wrong with either. But all things considered I would lean to the 708 as it's current. 73, Denni; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-07/msg00050.html (8,592 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Mic for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "David & Chris Drake" <drakes@psci.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:38:49 -0400; The 705 is a good mike. I believe they now have a 706 which looks the same but may be designed a bit different. The 705 is a very very good microphone. It was sold up through the introduction of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-07/msg00054.html (9,738 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Mic for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: "Verne Smith" <vernew7grn@cascadeaccess.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:56:20 -0700; find an old shure 444 for that jup u will like it I'm trying to decide on whether to buy a Ten Tec 705 or the new 708 Mic for my Jupiter. What's your opinion? Thanks, Bill K2rig Fists #2016 NJQRP #06; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-07/msg00058.html (8,441 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]