Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Mics\s+in\s+general\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Mics\s+in\s+general\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Mics in general (score: 1): Author: cshyde@yahoo.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 07:36:36 -0700 (PDT); I also tried several mics and use the TT 705. I bought a demo unit from Ten Tec. I understand the Heil is coming out with a modification to their mic to enhance its performance with the Ten Tecs. The; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00012.html (12,158 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Mics in general (score: 1): Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:38:36 -0400; Well said Carl, You can't put 50 pounds of potatoes in a 10 pound sack! Another thing to remember is the freq. response of the rig audio to rf output ratio. I've done some playing around with an audi; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00021.html (14,124 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Mics in general (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 11:54:35 -0700 (PDT); Just a note of clarification that the Heil HC-4 is the dx element and the HC-5 is the standard element. 73, Barry N1EU == __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sel; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00022.html (7,871 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Mics in general (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:30:48 +0100; Have you ever looked at the the 705 implementation. Those elements typically are very flat response and put out a fairly low level signal - wonder if that is what the 705 implements . --Original Mess; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00023.html (15,900 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]