Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+6\+\s+and\s+Iambic\s+\(Different\s+issues\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Martin W4FOA" <w4foa@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:59:55 -0500
Hi Bill, and others, Bill, we are in total agreement. I have been a member of the CFO (and FOC) gang for years...they are all superb CW operators. The CFO guys are for the most part the fellows you h
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00144.html (13,313 bytes)

2. RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:08:16 -0700
Tony, Ignore the first bit of my last email. I should have read my entire inbox before responding. Your ideas pretty much coincide with mine. There's one more point. Its the dit-memory and dah-memory
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00153.html (16,321 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@serv.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:39:00 -0700
I have a question for the group. Listening to QRQ from time to time I notice that many ops speed up briefly, especially when sending 599, then slow back down. How is this done? One notices it more in
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00154.html (9,068 bytes)

4. RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:58:23 -0700
Ben, They are using special-purpose contest keyers which are programmed to send the 599 at a high speed and then slow down for the part of the message which the operator on the other end must copy. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00155.html (10,861 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:24:42 -1000
Being a life long contester (40+ years), I have been to hundreds of events where as many as 30 or 40 operators were participating. I have often heard some of the guys who I consider to be great opera
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00157.html (9,408 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:30:43 -1000
I notice that many ops speed up briefly, especially when sending 599, then slow back down. How is this done? Hi Ben, Some keyers and some contest logging programs have the ability to "embed" commands
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00158.html (9,709 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Martin W4FOA" <w4foa@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 05:57:05 -0500
Ben, Some keyers will let you vary the speed within a "memory" text and that is what is happening. My AEA MM3 keyer will let you do that, as will numerous others I'm sure. Since, with few exceptions,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00160.html (10,385 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:09:31 -0500
All the Logikey keyers also have this capability. 73, Duane (Logikey K1 and K3 in the shack) Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00162.html (8,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu