Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+V\s+250\s+cw\s+filter\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+V\s+250\s+cw\s+filter\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI V 250 cw filter question (score: 1): Author: cyr999@extremezone.com (Tim and Nancy Logan); Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:15:02 -0700; Hi folks - I have an OMNI V with the 250 filter installed and a 500 in the narrow slot. Two Inrad 2.4, 10 pole filters are in the 2.4 slots. Here's my question. When I switch from the 500 to the 250; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00128.html (7,362 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI V 250 cw filter question (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:52:34 -0800 (PST); ..... This sounds like you have the PBT up center - top. I find the PBT almost always goes back to about 10 o'clock or so when using the 6.3 MHz filters in my Corsair or OMNI, it puts the filter into; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00130.html (7,858 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OMNI V 250 cw filter question (score: 1): Author: ve7asr@telus.net (Rick Williams); Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:58:53 -0800; I have the same set-up - two inrad 2.4, with T-T 500 and 250 Hz in the other slots. I get the best results with the PBT close to centred -- a bit off perhaps but not much. Unfortunately my Omni V is; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00135.html (8,248 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI V 250 cw filter question (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:21:57 -0600; Is the 250 Hz filter a CW filter or a RTTY filter? There's a difference. I have a 500 Hz CW filter and a 250 Hz CW filter. Other than the normal reduced bandwidth sound, there's little difference. Di; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00140.html (8,497 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]