Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VII\s+Comparison\s+Test\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VII\s+Comparison\s+Test\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:15:48 +0100; We have just posted our comparison test on the Bavarian Contest Club's website. The main purpose was to compare the OMNI VII against typical radios which we use for contesting, with primary focus on; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00103.html (8,342 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:14:46 -0800; Rick I am interested in the results of the S-meter test since this has been one of the on-going problems with Orion II, however the chart on the website link you posted is not showing up. I looked fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00110.html (10,604 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:33:13 -0500; It is just as Rick said. The S meter reads the same regardless of attenuator or preamp setting. The only other radio with th is quality is the rx340. Also, there is one other thing that has not been; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00111.html (12,335 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: Alan Sewell <alan.n5na@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:54:33 -0600; I just did a quick S meter check on my Omni VII with an Elecraft XG-1. I posted the results at http://www.tentecwiki.org/doku.php?id=588 . 73, Alan N5NA http://www.tentecwiki.org ____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00114.html (8,016 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:01:30 -0800; Having the S-meter software compensate for preamp and attenuator settings is something I have been asking for in the Orions for quite a while. My trusty TS-870 compensates for the preamp (menu select; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00115.html (15,388 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:02:12 +0000; I find the wanting of S Meter test to be a bit odd. S meters are not now nor have never been anything but a relative indication of a signal and never should have been install on any radio. With that; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00116.html (10,177 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni VII comparison test (score: 1): Author: "J. Crit Harley, MD, C.Ht." <jcharley@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:26:48 -0500; "It is just as Rick said. The S meter reads the same regardless of attenuator or preamp setting. The only other radio with this quality is the rx340." That may be true for Ten Tec gear. But the Flex; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00117.html (8,158 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:32:31 +0100; Heare they are. I will follow up on why they are missing online. Tnx Rick Rick I am interested in the results of the S-meter test since this has been one of the on-going problems with Orion II, howev; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00118.html (11,924 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:51:18 -0800; I would disagree. A properly calibrated S-meter is a valuable tool in today's ham shack. It can help determine if directional antennas that you or other are using work or if they have problems, they; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00119.html (11,746 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "John K Gotwals" <john@gotwals.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:30:20 -0500; An even lower-tech solution, and one which does not require waiting on Ten-Tec, is to get out the grease pencil and perform your own S-meter calibration. John, N9JG -- Original Message -- Date: Tue,; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00141.html (9,218 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII Comparison Test (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:21:51 -0500; So Ron what your saying is that the Orion II is generous in its readings ? By how much ? Just trying to compensate in my head . thanks John Molenda -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@son; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00160.html (12,882 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]