Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Working\s+DX\s+on\s+160m\s+with\s+low\s+dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Working\s+DX\s+on\s+160m\s+with\s+low\s+dipoles\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Working DX on 160m with low dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:25:47 +0800; Low dipoles on 160m are pretty worthless for working DX -- As the song goes, it aint necessarily so. A lot depends upon your ground conductivity, geomagnetic latitude and what time of night you trans; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00304.html (7,880 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Working DX on 160m with low dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:48:13 +0800; Oops, sorry about the typo - that should have been 220 countries. Low dipoles on 160m are pretty worthless for working DX -- As the song goes, it aint necessarily so. A lot depends upon your ground c; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00305.html (8,303 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Working DX on 160m with low dipoles (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:12:12 -0700; Steve, Good point. I don't disagree that there are exceptions like this, but for most paths at most times, low angle paths predominate. If you study the tutorial I referenced, you'll see that a heigh; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00327.html (8,829 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]