Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\s*$/: 115 ]

Total 115 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:37:52 -0500; John, You can kill stuff with ozone...so you can purify air and water that way of biological stuff....but you can't let it get out of course. But general air cleaning, by low concentrations of ozone.; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00075.html (15,663 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:46:53 -0800; Tie wraps and many plastics outside are more attacked by the Ultra violet rays of the sun. Ozone usually is made by electrical action such as arcing, (lightning), but dissipates in the lower atmosphe; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00076.html (8,553 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:46:18 -0500; It is true absolutely that UV also attacks plastics _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00077.html (9,477 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:11:25 -0500; Ionizers send out ions which are charged particles. They are attracted to tiny particles floating in the air be it dust, mite dander, whatever. This particle is now larger and has more weight. More i; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00086.html (9,913 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:28:08 -0500; Gary thanks for taking the time to write such a nice reply . I will pass this info around to people I know who use those air cleaners . All the best ! de John Molenda kb2huk -- Original Message -- Fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00093.html (11,357 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:43:26 -0500; Well...Ozone is a chemical.... it is 03 (subscripted of course) meaning it is three oxygen atoms linked together. This is unstable, and has a net charge ( i.e. not neutral) so it is an ion. Whether y; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00096.html (11,497 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: <ve3vg@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:19:26 -0500; Hey John... thanx for the tip... a variation on the old "dryer sheets in the green garbage bag trick" I traded a very nice IC735 to a person here in Ontario... he shot an email back (just missed me); /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00112.html (9,663 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 01:18:09 -0500; Well there ya go ! I quit about 6 years ago when I was smoking you couldn't tell me any different .. John kb2huk -- Original Message -- From: <ve3vg@sympatico.ca> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00116.html (10,429 bytes)
49. [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:52:50 -0400; Is anyone using a Heil Classic with an Orion or Orion II ? I am thinking of getting a new mic and am considering this one . thanks John kb2huk -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for privat; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00216.html (6,756 bytes)
50. [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:06:32 -0400; Hello all , I am in need of a new log book I write in all my entries and do not use a computer for logging . Can anyone recommend a good fancy log book . thanks John kb2huk -- I am using the free ver; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00065.html (7,540 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:24:34 -0600; Hi John, I make my own. I design it and print the sheet the way I want it. I then take it to Kinko's and have them make a 50 page bound copy. It's a little more expensive but, you at least get it the; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00067.html (8,057 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "george" <goofyham@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:15:15 -0400; John; Best suggestion I could make. Start computer logging. If you don't already! There are so many good free logging programs out there for you to choose from. It boggles my mind why you would still; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00069.html (7,252 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "W8BVH" <w8bvh@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:02:09 -0400; Hello George: I agree with you that it is easier to look up calls and find dupes ect., however there is still a lot of pleasure in writing them long hand. I spend time looking them over and rememberi; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00071.html (8,516 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:23:22 -0500; Logbooks for those of us making a few QSOs (or many) are still sold by ham radio stores, ARRL, and QCWA. Some of the Japanese rig makers give away very pretty logbooks. Check out ham radio dealers in; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00073.html (7,695 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:39:12 +0000; Hi John, I liked the reply about doing your own and getting it copied into a bound 50 sheet book. I use the ones from either the ARRL or one of the manufactures. I write the QSO into the paper log an; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00075.html (9,432 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:29:55 -0400; Gee George I really appreciate the Offer . I am not sure yet what I will do I do enjoy penning the info in and looking at it from time to time I do not Qsl as a rule but I still unofficially count my; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00078.html (9,868 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:58:59 -0600; I've been using ARRL log books for 53 years. I'm about to need a new one and I've decided to brew my own with a couple more columns. I like the wire spiral binding (which a local copy center can do f; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00083.html (9,693 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:11:05 -0600; Yah, dat's nice, until the computer croaks. My 53 year old paper logs are still as readable as they day they were made. My 30 year old computer media (8" floppy disks) probably isn't readable though; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00085.html (10,401 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "george" <goofyham@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:02:55 -0400; Dr. Johnson; I guess we agree to disagree on computer logging. I use DX4WIN as my computer logging software application. I print out my log once a month going forward, minimal loss here if computer c; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00086.html (9,010 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:50:09 -0600; I agree. One of the reasons I don't use my computer is that it takes too much time logging my contacts from my paper log. That's time that I could be operating. Also, the noise that my computer makes; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00089.html (12,636 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]