Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\-6\s+Plus\s+DSP\s+vs\.\s+Timewave\s+599zx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\-6\s+Plus\s+DSP\s+vs\.\s+Timewave\s+599zx\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni-6 Plus DSP vs. Timewave 599zx (score: 1): Author: Peter A. Klein" <pklein@seattleu.edu (Peter A. Klein); Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 16:28:47 -0700 (PDT); [this is a *long* quasi-review, but may prove useful to some folks] Bet you have Macintosh tube amps for your stereo system, right? :-) Here are my observations after a couple of weeks playing with t; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00228.html (16,896 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni-6 Plus DSP vs. Timewave 599zx (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A. Calvin); Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 22:02:54 -0500; Peter's reply on DSP is an excellent treatise on the usefulness of that technology. Myself, I prefer the JPS NIR-12 to the 599-ZX, though there is much less difference with that later Timewave model; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00230.html (8,544 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]