Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\-C\s+vs\.\s+\'930\;\s+hisssssss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\-C\s+vs\.\s+\'930\;\s+hisssssss\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:48:34 -0500; -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> Good thought. It reminded me of an in-line volume control I had for my headphones. I dug it up and put it in, and all is better now. By running the AF gain higher, the; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00054.html (8,154 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: agulseth@juno.com (Al Gulseth); Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 22:04:21 EST; Keith, You wrote... headphones. I dug it up and put it in, and all is better >now. By running the AF gain higher, the hisssss is masked.... Hmmm. It just dawned on me -- is the hiss from the RF/IF ch; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00058.html (8,224 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 22:42:38 -0500; The noise comes from the RF chain, not the AF. You can prove this by simply turning down your RF gain and observing that most of it goes away. Having a higher quality audio stage would accomplish ver; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00060.html (8,664 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: GeneN8KUA@aol.com (GeneN8KUA@aol.com); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:02:50 EST; Now for a while I had both an OMNI V and a 930S. Like Keith, I found the Ten-Tec to be a bit easier to listen to. During the time I had both, I found it really hard to find the busy cw condx that sho; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00061.html (8,212 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 06:48:25 -0500; Me too (AF filter in position 1). I always thought my Omni-C was almost silent, but dragged it out to see yesterday. There is a marked difference between not using any audio filtering (position 0) an; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00062.html (10,175 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:22:22 -0800 (PST); I went to check my OMNI-C with RF gain cut back against my Kenmore TS 850 with the RF gain cut back. The OMNI generates significantly more noise from the audio chain than the Kenmore. I used the same; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00068.html (8,024 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 23:08:39 -0500; Why yes, Gene, your old '930 is the one I tested. You too, decided the TenTec was a more desirable rig? Cool. -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> *snip* had -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00077.html (8,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]