Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+5\s+to\s+5\.5\s+MHz\s+VFO\s+IF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+5\s+to\s+5\.5\s+MHz\s+VFO\s+IF\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni 6+ 5 to 5.5 MHz VFO IF (score: 1): Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:07:10 -0600; The later Omni 6+ uses a 4 pin dual gate MOSFET for the feedback loop IF. It is a black round device as opposed to the earlier 3SK301. It does not use the ferrite bead on the one gate. Does anyone kn; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-11/msg00291.html (7,479 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ 5 to 5.5 MHz VFO IF (score: 1): Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:38:57 -0600; I was able to take a macro photo of this transistor. In Photoshop I was able to read the number as BF988. I bought one on eBay, hopefully it is not an empty. Gary ____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-11/msg00292.html (7,853 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ 5 to 5.5 MHz VFO IF (score: 1): Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:55:47 -0600; A quick check on line looks like it was designed for/used in TV tuners. Worst case you might be able to find one to "re-purpose" in a TV set of that era? 73, Al ______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-11/msg00296.html (8,784 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ 5 to 5.5 MHz VFO IF (score: 1): Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:19:31 -0600; Thanks! Yeah, I remember those in the tuners. I would guess Ten Ten did not use anything but off-the-shelf electronic parts back then. Not enough volume or value to justify custom devices. Gary _____; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-11/msg00297.html (9,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]