Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+problem\s+inquiry\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: bhalterman@desupernet.net (bhalterman@desupernet.net)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 09:53:16 -0500
I have a Omni 6+ that has rather annoying problem and I wonder if others might have noticed it too. The problem is not affecting the operation of the radio, it is Just DAMN annoying..... expecially w
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00262.html (9,876 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: kia@netins.net (Ken & Rose Kreis)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 10:03:19 -0600
My Omni VI+ kc digit does not jump. I use a dial speed of 1kc per rev. On FM it does have a higher kc per rev. (about 10kc) but I would think that is supposed to be on FM where the bandwidth is wide.
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00263.html (11,509 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: jmerril1@twcny.rr.com (John L Merrill)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 11:18:49 -0500
I've had a couple of OmniVIs over the years that have done that....maybe not as severe as you have mentioned, but I havent tried all of your combinations. Apparently some do and some dont. No big dea
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00264.html (11,343 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: bigmack@nortexinfo.net (Robert)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 10:28:26 -0600
Call TT, and ask them to ship you another encoder for the main tuning knob. I had them do that for my 301 kit when I got a bad encoder, and the entire problem vanished.. If you are out of warranty, i
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00265.html (11,054 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 08:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Yes. I have seen this on the two OMNI-VI's I have owned. Same thing for both, I just ignored the "feature" and let it go since it doesn't interfere with my general modes of operation. Does seem like
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00266.html (8,119 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 12:02:25 -0500
Swap the plugs on the board with RIT first, I've heard there the same. On Sat, 13 Nov 1999 10:28:26 -0600 Robert <bigmack@nortexinfo.net> writes: _____________________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00267.html (8,158 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 10:58:04 -0600
I think oddities in frequency from the encoder are caused by the encoder. The processor is dependent on their being two outputs from the encoder that change at different times. The one that leads ind
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00269.html (9,287 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: k7kj@teleport.com (Greg Hodsdon)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 12:09:13 -0800
I'd be willing to bet your problem is the encoder. I experienced a similar erratic behavior when my Omni6+ was delivered a year ago. TT sent out a replacement encoder and the problem was resolved. Tr
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00270.html (8,537 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 16:23:42 -0800 (PST)
FWIW, I just put in a new main tuning encoder I received from Ten-Tec, and my Omni 6 (opt 3) exhibits all the "problem" symptoms. Incidentally, they don't bother me at all. Swapping cables with the R
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00271.html (12,823 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Omni 6+ problem inquiry (score: 1)
Author: bigmack@nortexinfo.net (Robert)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 18:49:20 -0600
TT will replace for free any in warranty encoder, so , if you want it, and it is in warranty, just ask them to mail you one.. They sent it to me and had me ship the other one back in the same little
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00273.html (14,323 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu