Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\s+sensitivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\s+sensitivity\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "David" <dns@cablespeed.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:55:02 -0800; I just bought an Omni 6 and was surprised that in an a-b comparison with my Icom 751A it seemed noisier and less sensitive. I expected just the opposite and was not prepared for these results. I chec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00665.html (7,198 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:39:05 -0800; On Dec 17, 2004, at 2:55 PM, David wrote: I just bought an Omni 6 and was surprised that in an a-b comparison with my Icom 751A it seemed noisier and less sensitive. I expected just the opposite and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00674.html (9,491 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:05:28 -1000; 2. The OMNI VI passband tuning (PBT) is set so that you get a lot of "highs" (hiss) from the audio of the receiver. The carrier setpoints can do the same thing. The pair of 2.4 stock filters normally; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00679.html (10,876 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: DennisKT5D@aol.com; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 05:18:50 EST; I had an Icom-765 for awhile which sported a very good receiver comlete with all the filters for cw work. It had the PBT and IF shift mods done as well. I sat it down beside the Omni 6+ and did some; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00691.html (8,214 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:37:02 -0500; I recently got rid of an Icom 756 in favor of the Omni VI Opt.3. Side-by-side comparison showed that the Omni VI has a definite edge in weak-signal reception. The difference may be attributable to lo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00693.html (10,489 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:17:44 -0500; Boy, isn't that the truth!! In '92 I bought an Omni 6 and a Titan 425. During the 11 years of very hard use, they seldom ever had any failures. I was also into contesting, DX'ing, and 'fast' CW. Duri; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00694.html (11,908 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 07:25:18 -0800; Wonder how an Omni VI compares to a Corasir II in similar circumstances? thanks de Denton WB7TDG -- Original Message -- From: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, Dece; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00695.html (11,532 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:33:08 -0500; The Corsair II would drive you nuts in that situation. It's audio derived AGC would pop your eardrums on the stong signals so you reduce the RF gain then you can't hear the weak one's while the Omni; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00696.html (12,302 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:04:19 -0800; Ok Steve...here is my situation... I have an old Corsiar II that I am using for casual listening with a 500 hrz cw filter.. I currently use a Pegasus for psk mostly, but I notice it sounds better to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00697.html (14,326 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:17:44 -0500; The Pegasus is going to be easier on your ears than almost anything due to it's flat audio response, lack of crystal filters and DSP with gentle slopes. If you really want the superior selectivity of; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00698.html (15,490 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:34:45 -0800 (PST); I concur with Steve's assessment regarding the SSB rag chewing case. The Pegasus/Jupiter are probably the two most pleasant SSB rag chewing radios that there are. They are not however the best there; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00703.html (20,999 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:22:18 -0600; I also moved from an IC-765 to the Omni VI+ back in 1997. I found the identical scenario regarding hearing weak signals near strong ones, but my 765 had *significantly* more IF-chain hiss than the Om; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00722.html (10,844 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]