Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+V\s+\&\s+Paragon\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
Author: baldwin@primenet.com (Dan Baldwin)
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 14:29:10 -0700
Can anyone tell me if there is any real difference between the Omni V and Paragon except that the Paragon has a general SWL receiver ? Also are there any advantages over one to the other. Thanks Dan
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00385.html (7,254 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
Author: MCHOATE@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Your Name)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:16:52 -0500
Hello Dan, I am an Omni V owner and dont own a Paragon. I did go back an forth between which rig to buy when I was shopping. I already have a good SW radio so the general coverage of the Paragon was
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00393.html (9,036 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 07:11:02 -0800
Hi Guys: There's a bit more to the subject than what has been covered. The general coverage aspect is obvious. However - if you are a casual operator, working your buddy down the block, then the Para
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00394.html (11,202 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
Author: k8mn@clinet.fi (Dave Heil)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 17:10:18 -0700
Silly me! I didn't know that the Paragon was NG for DXing and contesting. Though I use an Omni VI Plus now, I managed to use my early Paragon (Serial number 103) to win the 1988 ARRL DX Africa plaque
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00396.html (7,968 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 10:34:48 -0800
Hi Dave: Never said it was a bad rig - just that the Omni series is much better in a heavy rf environment. That's not a guess, that's a matter of physics. Sorry if I insulted your Paragon. de KL7HF -
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00402.html (9,111 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu