Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s+or\s+VI\s+Opt\.\s+3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s+or\s+VI\s+Opt\.\s+3\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Meanwell SE-1500-15 and Tentec 420 (score: 1): Author: Martin Sole <hs0zed@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:03:18 +0700; Hi, Meanwell seem to have a good name for these brick type smps with regard to noise, not that they are perfect or don't need help in some situations though. I have recently been working on an SPE Ex; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00022.html (11,160 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 (score: 1): Author: "Petr Ourednik" <indians@xsmail.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 12:31:21 +0200; Hi folks, Sorry for bothering with that maybe stupid question... Can somebody explain me the differencies in between Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 please? As I have not that model in collection and never; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00023.html (7,257 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 (score: 1): Author: Greg Yates via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 06:59:27 -0400; Petr, I think the only difference is that the VI+ is directly from the factory and the option 3 is one that was sent back to the factory for the upgrade. Greg WB2BIN Hi folks, Sorry for bothering wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00024.html (8,855 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 (score: 1): Author: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:36:48 -0400; All folks that want to know more about TenTec radios should visit the Wki. https://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php There is a powerful lot of information there about each model. Greg, KC8HXO Sent from m; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00025.html (9,654 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 (score: 1): Author: Paul Kraemer <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:46:39 -0500; Also the 564 VI+ is some surface mount construction and slightly different font on front panel. I have both and see no difference in performance. Paul K0UYA I think the only difference is that the VI; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00026.html (8,231 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Pagel" <k9uw@wi-net.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 11:51:42 -0500; My recollection is that the transition to surface mount components occurred in later 6+'s and that the early units had more through the hole components. Researching the issue brought up some helpful; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00027.html (8,938 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 (score: 1): Author: Bob McGraw K4TAX <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 13:34:10 -0500; To answer the question; Can somebody explain me the differences in between Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3 please? Evolutionary changes in no particular order: * The 564 has a different font silk-screened; /archives//html/TenTec/2020-07/msg00028.html (10,367 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]