Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Open\s+sourcing\s+again\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:39:51 -0500
It would sure seem that TT could kill two birds with one stone by allowing 3rd parties to write code for their radios. Proprietary software is a valuable business asset but only if you capitalize on
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00364.html (7,145 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: Jeff <n3jbh@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:24:13 -0800 (PST)
"It would sure seem that TT could kill two birds with one stone by allowing 3rd parties to write code for their radios." I agree the other fine American radio manufactures seem to be have huge amount
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00371.html (7,379 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:39:36 -0500
Well one scenario I can thing of is someone installs after market software, it doesn't work right and many features left out, radio is sold as is to new owner, new owner says this is a piece of @^$$%
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00375.html (8,699 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:16:13 EST
Well, I obviously can't speak for anyone but myself, but if I had wanted an open source system I'd have bought a Flex. I'd humbly suggest that anyone who wants open source simply go and do that. 73 R
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00379.html (9,863 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:40:32 -0600
Interesting - wasn't it three or four years ago Elecraft showed off the amp? Does that mean they'll actually be selling it this time? 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Origi
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00380.html (8,925 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:40:44 +0000
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Flex's firmware is proprietary. Its PC Software is open source, but the rig's firmware is proprietary, ja? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00381.html (7,732 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:19:48 -0800
IIRC it was about 2 and a half years ago they showed the first prototypes which you can see at: www.n6ie.com/Elecraft.html They claimed that they production was being held up by FCC type-acceptance r
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00382.html (10,858 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:20:42 -0500
Correct. If your product is based upon the software/firmware and you give it away, what do you own?? Nothing.? Just vapor.? No protection or income even though you created it. It's a little like copy
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00385.html (10,337 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:48:43 -0600
A very common issue from my past experience. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00389.html (10,587 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:59:54 -0600
Only the "console" (gui) is open source. -- Wayne Whitman Cell:270-282-3550 wwhitman@fastmail.fm _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00391.html (8,393 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Yes the Flex firmware is closed source. But the "firmware" control is confined to the very low level hardware aspects of the Flex radio models. It only provides control over band segment access (FCC
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00393.html (10,026 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu