Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/: 151 ]

Total 151 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:55:56 -0400; Yep. The $2,200 was on a Orion w/o tuner. And Scott said the $2,200 was the pay up to reach the $3,995 figure. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00628.html (10,448 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:11:00 -0400; WOW!!! Hard to believe....that can't be right! the an old color _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00630.html (11,464 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:57:24 -0000; There are certainly many fascinating views expressed here and apparently some confusion over what is going on. It is quite reasonable that product enhancements be confined to an Orion II. Colour disp; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00646.html (10,881 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:09:32 -0400; You have the math backwards. I talked with Scott about this. The trade-in for an Orion without the tuner is $2200. This is 2/3 of the original price. So a trade-in upgrade for an Orion II without the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00653.html (15,348 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:04 -0400; OK - I've read all the commentary through the night and will address some of the various points brought up in emails I've read. I'm sure this isn't the end of the discussion yet.... Regarding parts o; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00679.html (15,959 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:52:25 -0400; Thanks, Scott. The Orion is a great radio despite what all the appliance operators say. I think it's kind of exciting to see the Orion evolve. I get too bored just sitting down and operating a radio.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00682.html (16,760 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:34:05 -0000; now? ** a That's about the time I ordered mine. If you would have published that info i could have delayed purchase a bit. year, I even sluggishness particular would believe have my forthcoming sugge; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00684.html (19,125 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:05:27 -0400; Thanks, Scott, from a very satisfied and happy Orion owner. I know of no other company that would take the time or make the effort to respond as you have. I hope this will eliminated some of the drib; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00686.html (18,220 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Williams, Barry" <Bnwilliams@varco.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:09:22 -0500; Scott, Thanks for the update. When you made the announcement I looked at Motorola's original announcement of the Dragonball Super VX, published in June of 2001. They announced that the processor woul; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00687.html (16,384 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "John T. Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:20:49 -0500; IF I had experienced problems with my Orion that others have described on this reflector, then I would be very upset that T-T had elected to introduce the O-II without first fixing my O-I issues. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00690.html (18,530 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Wayne White" <wew2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:49:25 -0700; I thought the whole idea of the Orion was to produce a radio that would never be obsolete, a radio that can always be upgraded, never growing old. The JA gear was used as an example of radios that we; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00746.html (8,967 bytes)
32. [TenTec] ORION II (score: 1): Author: "Len Umina" <umina@theuminas.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:28:40 -0700; I was at Dayton and "sold" on the fact that Orion was "upgradeable". I ordered one on the spot. It has been pretty dissapointing. Yes, the roofing filters blow away everything else, and I've got ever; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00748.html (14,819 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Martin Kratoska <marcom@centrum.cz>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:06:52 +0200; Here are some (probably stupid) Orion II thoughts: I can hardly employ the 6 or even 20 kHz wide filter so i wonder if T-T can supply the Orion II with the 600 Hz and 1.8 kHz filters instead (however; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00757.html (10,050 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:57:06 -0000; I have already made clear my concerns raised by the Orion II product announcement. Subsequently, I have communicated with Jack Burchfield directly about the outstanding issues of front panel control/; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00764.html (13,852 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Tom Wagner" <tfwagner@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:02:12 -0400; Bob -- What do you mean by RS-232 command speed issue? 73, Tom Wagner - N1MM Check out the N1MM Free Contest Logger at: http://www.n1mm.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/N1MMLogger/ I have already ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00765.html (14,492 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:24:24 -0000; Tom This is the rate at which the DragonBall processes commands issued via the RS-232 port. It is nothing to do with line speed, which as you know is probably as fast as any radio. The new firmware i; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00768.html (16,483 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:33:00 -0400; While I certainly hope that the reassurances you received become fact, I also have dealt with Mr. Burchfield. After several experiences I would have to say I am more than skeptical of anything promis; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00769.html (16,330 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:35:31 -0400; All of this anxiety about the Original Orion could have been avoided if TT had released the 2.0 upgrade with all of it's "supposed" improvements before announcing a new Orion 2. This is a strange str; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00774.html (11,380 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] ORION II (score: 1): Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:39:12 -0500; Folks, chill out, have a snickers and relax!! GEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!! Lawsuits and the like over the introduction of a new ham radio transceiver. Let's all take a very deep breath. Now,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00775.html (17,318 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 05:08:09 -0700; Toby, you have some unrealistic dreams! What we are witnessing here is what goes on every day in the world. Not just ham radios, but cars, computers, anything. Something new announces every day and e; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00778.html (12,774 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]