Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/: 151 ]

Total 151 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:05:15 -0400; Mr. Spock, once again you make a presumption I differ with. In fact, I'm willing to bet you're logic is illogical.. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00783.html (8,940 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:24:51 -0400; I agree. It seems to me that TenTec will want to fully exploit the capabilities of the new Orion 2 hardware. 73 Chas W3KC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00784.html (8,618 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:24:10 -0700; Windows runs on a variety of Intel as well as AMD processors. Others as well. Why would Orion code not be able to run on two generations of Dragons? Mr. Spock, once again you make a presumption I dif; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00785.html (9,449 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:50:36 -0500; was that JA reference in the ads , or was it the reactive response of some who were busy trying to defend the early burps in the Orion...and their decision to buy a "not yet fully burped" new creatur; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00794.html (9,036 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed_ww3a@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:08:47 -0400; Pretty interesting........We are now looking to an Orion II, but STILL not a "Dream Radio One" in sight............ -- Reed O. Krenn reed_ww3a@alltel.net "You will be reincarnated as a toad -and you; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00797.html (8,012 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:23:13 -0000; May simply depnd on sped and what their OS if any supports. -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: "'Barry Gross'" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tente; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00866.html (10,754 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:23:37 -0500; Ten Tec has both radios on their web site, so anyone should be able to see there is a follow on. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01043.html (8,966 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:05:44 -0400; I think I am beginning to understand the problem. When Ten Tec marketed the Orion (the original, unofficially called the "Orion 1" or "O1" now) as, in effect if not in these exact words "the last rad; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01053.html (10,155 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "nn9s" <nn9s@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:06:20 -0500; I don't really understand what is going on with Ten Tec as far as posting pictures of the new rig. I really am interested in buying a new unit but am I the only one that feels this way and thinks it; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00122.html (7,042 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: John Merrill <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 21:48:23 -0400; I agree. I hope they aren't having problems. John N1JM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00125.html (7,226 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:42:32 +0000; It is more than strange, it's bizarre. Am i to understand there is a display ad in QST that either doesn't show the rig, or shows the Orion 1? These guys have to get their act together when it comes; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00213.html (8,349 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:50:17 -0400; Think, folks! The ad appearing in the Oct. QST was probably ok'd by Ten-Tec to be developed by their ad agency some time in May, or possibly June....ads, especially full page ads, must be placed with; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00214.html (9,408 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:50:41 -0500; No, it shows something "in-between" the Orion and Orion II -- with the black and white display "curled" at one corner to reveal a color rainbow underneath. The radio has an Orion II logo. Other than; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00215.html (7,863 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:03:42 -0400; To me the ad in the new (October) QST seems fine. The front panel says Orion II and the display is being peeled back to highlight the new TFT color display and contrast it to the previous black and w; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00216.html (7,994 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:12:54 -0700 (PDT); I was shocked that the display which was clearly a prototype meant to get the box up and working actually ended up being the production design. B&W is one thing, but the alphabet soup nature of the t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00217.html (8,348 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:19:12 -0500; Are you talking about the Orion B&W display? I don't think it was a "prototype". It was a B&W display. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00218.html (7,050 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:33:27 -0700 (PDT); OM Chas W3KC, Don't confuse us with facts...we want to believe the worst. The sun is acting up...solar flares make the bands unpredictable...we do not know when we will have the new 2.0 software rele; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00219.html (7,860 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:34:31 -0400; -- Original Message -- From: "Joseph A. Ryan" Think, folks! The ad appearing in the Oct. QST was probably ok'd by Ten-Tec to be developed by their ad agency some time in May, or possibly June....ads,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00224.html (8,102 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:01:10 EDT; I think we will see the new orion when we see the new orion, not before, not after, and probably at the ten tec swaree~ in October hopefully the ver 2 will come out near the same time.. patience, my; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00231.html (7,553 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "D. Kemp" <nn8b@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:23:33 -0700 (PDT); To All. The Orion II is alive and operating at the Ten Tec hamfest tent. The screen color is superb. It looks alive. Very impressive. I will wait in line tomorrow to operate it. Don , NN8B __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00462.html (8,074 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]