Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+on\s+order\,\s+filter\s+questions\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion II on order, filter questions (score: 1)
Author: ac9s@mchsi.com
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:05:49 +0000
Hi - I succumbed at Dayton and ordered a new Orion II. To be truthful I have been studying the 7800, 9000 and Orion II literature pretty seriously for a while; the tipping point was Rob Sherwood's up
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00078.html (8,402 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II on order, filter questions (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:14:48 -0400
This problem was fixed with the O2. It looks like the manual needs updating. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: <ac9s@mchsi.com> To: <t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00079.html (9,231 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Orion II on order, filter questions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:02:50 -0400
AC9S: The question - the manual recommends using a moderately wide CW roofing filter (1 khz) for general, non crowded, weak signal dx - due to increased loss with narrower filters. In the QST review
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00089.html (8,993 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II on order, filter questions (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:11:17 -0400
Bill Tippett wrote: ...For this reason, unless you are expecting extremely close-spaced interference (such as in contests, multi-transmitter environments, etc), you may not need ANY optional filters.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00090.html (7,651 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion II on order, filter questions (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:10:49 -0600
i agree! except in rare cases working CW with the standard 1k filter in place is more than sufficient. i like the sound of the passband too with that filter as i have a residually high noise level du
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00098.html (9,352 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu