Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+III\s+\(was\:\s+Orion\s+firmware\s+gripes\!\)\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:56:16 +0000
Interesting comments Bob! I have to agree about being a pretty happy camper with my O as well. Perhaps above everything else, I value the listenability of the receiver - it's easy to listen to for ho
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00433.html (15,115 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "george" <goofyham@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:40:39 -0500
Am I missing something with not wanting a Sub receiver as good as the Main? I've owned a O1 and now a O2 for over 4 years and never had need for a Sub receiver as good as the Main. I like the Sub the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00440.html (8,795 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: BobK8IA@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:52:14 EST
Am I missing something with not wanting a Sub receiver as good as the Main? I've owned a O1 and now a O2 for over 4 years and never had need for a Sub receiver as good as the Main. I like the Sub the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00441.html (8,333 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:08:39 -0500
Yeah. I do a lot of contesting with the Orion in SO2V (as Bob just described) and also in stereo diversity to take advantage of different reception characteristics of multiple antennas. (see n1eu.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00442.html (10,618 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "george" <goofyham@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:25:31 -0500
Thanks for each of your insight on the Sub receiver issue. I see more clearly now. George W2YJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00443.html (7,706 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Berg" <tony.w1ot@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:13:09 -0500
"... equal audio side tone output when going from speaker to head phones..." - I'd like to see that in the Omni VII, too. Tony W1OT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00445.html (8,872 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:35:57 -0500
Hi, Buck You probably have not missed a thing, depending on how you operate. That's why I suggested a second main rx as an option for those who see a need for it. In a really crushing pileup with a n
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00446.html (10,704 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:12:43 EST
I would too, and would be willing to give up general coverage to get it (I use my Argonaut V for SW reception anyway). However, I would have no use for decoding-panadaptor support or enhanced compute
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00447.html (8,568 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:10:40 -0500
Hi George , Read your email and thought I might say hello again . I am up on Liberia and would like carry on a little correspondence if you have time . your neighbor John kb2huk -- Original Message -
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00452.html (10,837 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:10:40 -0500
Robert Carroll writes... With my use of an RX-320 as a sub-receiver to my Omni V, I find it usually acceptable to use the sub-receiver to listen to the DX station and the main receiver for the pileup
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00453.html (10,513 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:10:52 -0500
Robert Carroll writes... With my use of an RX-320 as a sub-receiver to my Omni V, I find it usually acceptable to use the sub-receiver to listen to the DX station and the main receiver for the pileup
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00454.html (10,519 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: Duane Calvin <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:11:03 -0600
With my Orion I, I use the main RX to pull the DX station out of the mud, QRM, jammers, and cops. It's very important to hear him. The subRX is more than sufficient for listening to and placing my si
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00462.html (11,674 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu