- 1. [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:47:18 -0400
- Mark has a great point. Frequency step is clearly a "VFO" property, but it is assigned to the main/sub receiver. You might (or might not) say the same for RIT and XIT. Anything that sets or modifies
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00350.html (10,041 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:18:52 -0700
- All nice thoughts Martin, but I guess if we let our imaginations run, each of us would come up with our own unique panel layout. It begs the question, do we "really" need a legacy front panel? Yuri s
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00351.html (9,714 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:48:17 -0500
- Oh no, not this discussion again! Look back in the archives when the Pegasus came out. I do find it interesting that the Pegasus eventually went away to be replaced by the Jupiter, which is the same
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00354.html (11,422 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:06:24 -0400
- Kinda funny. Everyone wants what they want...me too! I want ALL of the firmware problems fixed! And for me, there are only three 'major' firmware problems remaining, i.e., Keying Loop (so the Orion c
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00356.html (13,029 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: Dudley Hurry <jhurry@austin.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:14:35 -0500
- Rick, I guess you have not used Carl's (N4PY) software with the remote pod. With this you can program all 15 buttons to different functions, and with that I can control most of the functions of the J
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00361.html (12,357 bytes)
- 6. RE: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:03:23 -0700
- Duane, you are neglecting one minor but very important detail: time. Things change and change is happening faster and faster. Just one year ago I would have sworn on a stack of Ten-Tecs that I would
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00363.html (8,638 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:20:05 -0500
- I didn't neglect that detail. Until I see a "virtual" design that does things faster and more efficiently than knobs and buttons, there is no reason for me to switch. If I have to grab the mouse to m
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00364.html (10,583 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:17:35 -0400
- Amen!!! Tom - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00369.html (11,828 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu