Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+reflector\s+discussions\s+and\s+others\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+reflector\s+discussions\s+and\s+others\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Orion reflector discussions and others (score: 1): Author: "Ron Pfeiffer" <n1zsw@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:03:13 -0400; I have been reading this reflector for several years and have observed the same behavior three times now. When the Jupiter was first released there was an avalanche of discontent wrought upon this re; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00204.html (8,986 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion reflector discussions and others (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:29:25 -0500; on the contrary , I think the comments, while still not entirely favorable, are indicating a MORE stable radio. Such additional comments are the only way I would start to consider spending 3 K on a r; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00208.html (10,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]