Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+vs\s+K3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+vs\s+K3\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs K3 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Spencer" <ron.e.spencer@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:14:35 -0400; Interesting read. I did own an Orion (original not 2). Sold it to buy a K3. My reasons were strictly based on the qualities of the K3's second receiver and the radios ability to survive (better) in a; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00271.html (7,931 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs K3 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:50:04 -0400; Just to second what others have said, both the Orion and K3 are the best there is when it comes to receiver performance. Each has features I prefer but the basic RX performance is very similar. I als; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00286.html (10,437 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Orion vs K3 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Spencer" <genteknc@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:05:54 -0400; Interesting read. I did own an Orion (original not 2). Sold it to buy a K3. My reasons were strictly based on the qualities of the K3's second receiver and the radios ability to survive (better) in a; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00305.html (8,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]