Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+vs\.\s+Omni\s+V\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+vs\.\s+Omni\s+V\s+Questions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Paragon vs. Omni V Questions (score: 1): Author: Steve" <sswhite@mchsi.com (Steve); Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:58:33 -0500; I am trying to understand the differences in performance of the Omni V as compared to the Paragon. Setting aside for the moment the differences in the keyboard layouts and the man machine interface w; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00109.html (6,953 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Paragon vs. Omni V Questions (score: 1): Author: resluder@coserv.net (R. Eric Sluder); Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 18:22:30 -0500; I can only comment on the RS-232C board. They are rare according to a call I made a long time ago to TT headquarters. It doesn't do a whole lot for you either because there is no hardware flow contro; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00111.html (8,070 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Paragon vs. Omni V Questions (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:19:03 -0400; Steve, Back when the Paragon and Omni V were in production, I had both and put them side by side on the bench to compare receivers. I'm sure that if the two radios had the receivers specs measured wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00122.html (11,540 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]