Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+Query\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+Query\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Pegasus Query (score: 1): Author: kc4tbh@mpinet.net (John Watson); Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 23:45:09 -0400; Hello All; I am waiting for my Pegasus to arrive, and I am curious to see if anyone on the list has any "hints" as to there being any quirks, or the like with the Pegasus. I am the 2nd owner of the r; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00378.html (7,668 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Pegasus Query (score: 1): Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons); Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:44:41 -0700; The N4PY software is better. The remote is very useful and the N4PY software handles the remote much better then the Ten Tec software. The pegasus is very good for digital modes. I use soundcard mode; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00379.html (8,411 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Pegasus Query (score: 1): Author: mgusky@yahoo.com (Michael Gusky); Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:43:05 -0700 (PDT); I think you will find Carl, N4PY's software brings out more features with the GUI and is much easier to use. Although, TenTec makes the source code available for folks to work with and experiment. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00380.html (9,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]