Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+review\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+review\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Pegasus review... (score: 1): Author: kc0dxf@yahoo.com (Robert Wooldridge); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT); All, There is a review of the Pegasus up at eHam: http://www.eham.net/reviews/?review_list=165 The reviewer has some criticism of the CW operation. Can anyone else confirm this? == -Bob Wooldridge KC; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00478.html (7,446 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Pegasus review... (score: 1): Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:38:55 -0400; I have a Ten Tec friend that was asking about the Pegasus and how the computer worked with the RF so close. Any problems? How about with an amp. in line? Thank you es I love my Omni!! -JeffAA8VE ____; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00481.html (8,822 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Pegasus review... (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron); Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 04:31:23 +0100; Think RF getting into a computer is largely a function of the computer. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUE; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00495.html (9,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]