Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Poor\s+CW\s+note\s+on\s+Pegasus\s+and\s+Jupiter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Poor\s+CW\s+note\s+on\s+Pegasus\s+and\s+Jupiter\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:47:05 -0000; I have heard many times on this reflector comments about the CW note on the Pegasus and now the Jupiter being below par. My experience in using the my Pegasus for over a year is originally I had a ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00187.html (8,552 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: kf5mc@flash.net (J. Pursley); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:04:59 -0600; I'm with you Carl. Had the same problem with the Paragon and CorsairII. Have to get the power supply away from the rig......Joe -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00188.html (9,389 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 20:00:02 -0500; I worked on my Pegasus's rough CW note for a week and traced it to the 70mhz oscillator. I could listen to it with my IC-706 directly. The oscillator is very sensitive to stray fields as Carl mention; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00189.html (11,031 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:25:51 -0000; The point I am trying to make is I believe a lot of people have their power supply or computer monitor too close to their pegasus or jupiter, thus creating the problem and the bad rap. Incidently, in; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00191.html (12,620 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:20:26 -0500; Quite correct about the power supplies being too close. One wouldn't expect that to matter but some rigs seem rather susceptible to those stray fields. That 70mhz oscillator I mentioned is overly sen; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00193.html (14,375 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 22:12:02 -0800; Carl very good points. In the world of digital audio, we call this effect "clock jitter". Nothing new, just fact of life. Hence the reason most digital audio system use a switching PSU. Plus, it's ea; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00205.html (9,619 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Poor CW note on Pegasus and Jupiter (score: 1): Author: stan@studio-maint.com (Stan Jacox); Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:01:21 -0800; Hello Bob and list I have a little different take on all this. Clock frequency instability is usually called FM in digital audio since it is a frequency modulation with a comparatively high modulatio; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00206.html (10,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]