Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QRV\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QRV\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: east3rd@sj.bigger.net (Ross F. Guldenbrein NW6R); Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 04:00:54 -0800; Hey All, I'm wondering if anybody out there leaves their radio on 24 hrs. a day like I do. And if not, why is this a bad practice. Some days I may only listen for a few minutes just to check the band; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00019.html (7,433 bytes)
2. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 06:55:51 -0600; ROSS OLE' BUDDY; Surely your aware of the added drain on the internal QSO counter built into the microprocessor pipeline architecture? This undocumented feature insures cash flow in a positive way to; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00021.html (8,841 bytes)
3. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: aas@vectorbd.com (Al Scanandoah); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 13:20:45 +0000 (UTC); like I do. And if not, why is this a bad practice. Some days I may > only listen for a few minutes just to check the bands while on other > days I have time for a few QSOs. Any thoughts you'd care t; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00022.html (7,784 bytes)
4. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 07:29:14 -0600; WOW! I had heard rumors about this secret feature but this is the first time I have seen it published. I'm sure gonna be careful now. Bill To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00023.html (9,693 bytes)
5. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: k8mn@clinet.fi (Dave Heil); Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 15:55:45 -0800; Do a little basic math--your 20A supply can't even do that under transmit conditions. With the receiver on, more like a half amp or so. The only reason to get an antenna off the thing is that the PIN; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00028.html (7,843 bytes)
6. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: chuck@topsail.org (Chuck Murcko); Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 11:18:44 -0500; Let's see, 13.8V at 0.5A (pretty loud AF gain setting on receive) is 6.9 watts. Divide by 0.7 (assume a low efficiency on the power supply) and I get 9.86 watts. That won't even cause a blip on my po; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00030.html (7,943 bytes)
7. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 4 Mar 1998 11:26:43 -0500; Hi, My take on this was it was done in tube days to avoid the inrush current surge as the tubes warmed up and to prolong then the power supply component life, and the tube life. But today, rigs shoul; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00033.html (8,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]