Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QTH\.net\s+Ten\-Tec\s+group\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QTH\.net\s+Ten\-Tec\s+group\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:22:15 -0400; Jim Lowman has done a great job administering the Ten-Tec reflector groups. I belong to this one and the QTH group. I find the QTH group's postings are more focused and concise, whereas we can--and d; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00163.html (7,387 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:38:06 -0500; John, in all fairness, the "working over" that appeared on the reflector was offset by a factor of about 10 to 1 in the number of private emails I got thanking me for my unintentional but frank posti; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00165.html (8,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]