Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+More\s+to\s+Orion\s+vs\s+Icom\s+756PRO\s+II\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Budd" <w5ben@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:13:15 -0500
Gee, you ought to get something for the $1000+ the Orion costs! 73 Duane Budd w5ben@arrl.net -- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:25:12 -0000 From: "W0YG Charlie Summers" <w0yg@plusten.net> To: "TenTec" <ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00639.html (8,689 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 14:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Hmmm I bet this guy owns the PRO lol Personally, I own the original PRO and can't see for the life of me why I would want a even better one, different strokes.... 73 Duane Budd w5ben@arrl.net -- Date
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00640.html (8,745 bytes)

3. [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:01:52 -0500
the 1.5 KW neighbor within a mile of me. Well, unfortunately I could not be on the same band as my AGC pumps everywhere. It renders the 756PRO II virtually useless... I'll bet the K2 receiver ($669 i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00649.html (8,225 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Mike Manship <w9oj@peoplepc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:26:16 -0500
run If I could buy a K2 for $669 fully assembled then this comparison would be more apples-to-apples. 73 de Mike W9OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00669.html (8,255 bytes)

5. RE: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: "jmalloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:51:13 -0500
Hey, Mike, I'll assemble your K2 kit for free -- no time restraints, of course (but it won't be geological time either!) but the price is right. Then you can compare the K2 at your cost (rig + 2x shi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00670.html (8,951 bytes)

6. [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:59:15 -0500
would be more apples-to-apples. You can Mike! Most used K2's sell for the kit cost alone. There are even guys who enjoy building them so much that they would probably build you a new one for free if
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00671.html (9,031 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: "J. D." <duffyb01@fuse.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:55:37 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Now I remember why I voted for a separate Orion forum. This reflector has turned into nothing but an Orion forum. Is there any place else to go where we can talk about the rest of TenTec's line? If I
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00686.html (7,959 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:59:13 -0800 (PST)
SURE, it's called unsubscribe I guess...hmmm "J. D." <duffyb01@fuse.net> wrote:Now I remember why I voted for a separate Orion forum. This reflector has turned into nothing but an Orion forum. Is the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00687.html (8,779 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:05:55 EST
Funny, really don't see much other neat discussions on here, so must be at this time ORION is the hot topic. It's open, post anything you want.... When I see stuff about X or Y that I'm not intereste
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00690.html (8,017 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu