Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RF\s+susceptibility\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RF\s+susceptibility\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RF susceptibility (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:15:16 -1000; Hi Bill (and group), Yes, you are right about changing the subject line. I have changed it in this response. Many of us have limited space for our ham shack and antennas. This often results in our tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00149.html (12,664 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RF susceptibility (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:07:14 -0600; Any susceptibility to RF that gets back into the rig, starts with the quality of shielding (or not) of the headphone cords. Many modern headphones do not even use shielded cords, nor twisted cords li; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00152.html (9,095 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RF susceptibility (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:35:07 -0600; If that's a problem, the device needs better roll off control, but you can get RF bypassing and HF roll off with a small resistor, say 8 or 10 ohms in series with the bypassing capacitor. -- 73, Jerr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00162.html (9,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]