Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-320\s+as\s+a\s+sub\s+receiver\s+for\s+OMNI\s+VI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-320\s+as\s+a\s+sub\s+receiver\s+for\s+OMNI\s+VI\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX-320 as a sub receiver for OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:30:45 -0000; I would like to know if OMNI VI owners have any interest in using an RX-320 receiver as a sub receiver for the OMNI VI. If there is enough interest, I could enhance my RX-320 program to read the nece; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00272.html (7,159 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RX-320 as a sub receiver for OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: MNEWELL1@austin.rr.com (Michael Newell); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:14:53 -0600; I think it's a great idea (since I already have an RX-320), but it would be even better if the OMNI's remote tuning encoder could be made to tune the RX-320 so you wouldn't have to take your hands of; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00275.html (7,305 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]