Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Raspy\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Raspy\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Raspy? (score: 1): Author: hamike@earthlink.net (Michael Todd); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:26:16 -0700; reports have been received. Anyone else experience this? I have just installed the Radio Shack #40-5024 speaker to see (hear) if that makes a difference. Some signals have a more pronounced rasp tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00321.html (6,646 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Raspy? (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:10:43 EST; O.K., now I am confused. Were you referring to the CW note on transmission from the Jupiter or the CW note as received by the Jupiter? To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00332.html (7,316 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Raspy? (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:54:47 -0500; It's the transmitted note, not the received and this was mentioned in the QST review. I just had a QSO with one and it sounded like poor power supply filtering but the owner described it as phase noi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00333.html (8,242 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]